El domingo, 29 de julio de 2007 00:03 +0200, Jens Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > Buenas noches folks!
Hi Jens. > A while back I found out through che on irc that svn version of > initng uses /etc/initng/default.runlevel as default instead of > /etc/initng/runlevel/default.runlevel. Now this move back to the old > one seems a bit odd to me as I thought that having a separate dir for > runlevels was a good idea indeed. And it would be nice if there was a > "local" runlevel file too as default. And if you have them in its own > dir you can skip the file extensions alltogether. The change was made as a side effect of a limitation in service_file, but that limitation is gone, so now we can go back to using a runlevel/ dir. I've committed the necesary changes a few hours ago. > Proposal for a default scheme: > > /etc/initng/runlevel/default -> Here you ONLY put which other > runlevels to use! (just "system" and "local" in this example, no > paths needed) /etc/initng/runlevel/system -> Here goes DISTRO > SPECIFIC stuff that the user should not ever have to touch. > /etc/initng/runlevel/local -> Here goes user specific stuff. > > It would make it "a lot" easier for different distros to help and > support each other if there was a default scheme that worked out of > the box. :D +1. > And a little late but i vote yes on switching to gplv3. > Keep up the good work all and looking forward to use Initng with the > new shiny initng-scripts layout. > > greets jens >
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ Initng mailing list [email protected] http://jw.dyndns.org/mailman/listinfo/initng
