On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 12:57:15PM -0600, Victor Lowther wrote:
>> The introduction of additional bashisms is something I'm not sold on.
>
> Well, it seems that most of the concern about bashisms has to do with
> the code that ends up on the initrd. Making that code strictly posix is
> probably a good thing.
>
> There is no real benifit in having the initrd generating code be
> strictly posix, IMHO. It could be written in C, python, haskell, or
> INTERCAL.
Good point. I admit my comment was a knee-jerk reaction from reading
the first post without having read the whole patchset.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
