On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 11:28:07AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Any objection to replace "libexec" with "lib"?
>
> According to LSB/FHS, applications are required to use a named
> directory in /usr/lib/:
>
> http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRLIBLIBRARIESFORPROGRAMMINGANDPA
> Some distros, like e.g. SUSE, don't allow packages to use libexec at all.
>
> Would be nice, if we could do something like:
> sed -i 's#/usr/libexec/dracut#/usr/lib/dracut#' Makefile dracut dracut.spec
I'm not against this change. This a particularly egregious redhat-ism
that is guaranteed to break pretty much everywhere else.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
