On Saturday, June 27, 2015 08:41:53 AM Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> В Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:55:57 +0200
> 
> > diff --git a/modules.d/90dmraid/module-setup.sh
> > b/modules.d/90dmraid/module-setup.sh index e8de5f5..b77bbcf 100755
> > --- a/modules.d/90dmraid/module-setup.sh
> > +++ b/modules.d/90dmraid/module-setup.sh
> > @@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ install() {
> > 
> >      inst "$moddir/dmraid.sh" /sbin/dmraid_scan
> > 
> > +    inst_rules 64-md-raid.rules 66-kpartx.rules 67-kpartx-compat.rules
> > +
> 
> Why 64-md-raid.rules is here?

Probably the same reason why it slipped in once:
I mixed up md and dm and thought it is a dmraid rule which should
get in again if kpartx rules are used.

Thanks for finding this, the rule is already added at the right place:
modules.d/90mdraid/module-setup.sh
and should not show up here again.

I repost this one.

     Thomas


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to