Erich Schubert wrote: >Hi, > > >>I think we resolve a lot of problem if we make a fs writable from the >>beginning. I think it can be a ram fs (i.e. in /boot/init) that >> >> > >I've thought about that, and IIRC gentoo uses something alike. >Still I'd prefer to not need that. >Sure, we can do lots of nice stuff with it - especially by keeping >status information there, replacing init "live" can be done much >easier. > > You can pretty much keep trying to open /dev/unix_socket after execution of each script until it works, it'll add a TINY bit of overhead, but.. not much really, trying to open it 1-5-10 times wont really make much difference.
> > >>An other point, I think we should forget runlevel. lilo and linux support >> >> >Sure, I agree. I don't have classic runlevels any more for a long time. >I have two runlevels - "full" and "suspend", and switch these before >and after suspend. > >But it would be nice (but surely handleable via an external app) to >support classic runlevels via some mapping - e.g. 1=single 2=full >5=suspend > >best regards, >Erich Schubert >-- > erich@(mucl.de|debian.org) -- GPG Key ID: 4B3A135C (o_ > To understand recursion you first need to understand recursion. //\ > Wo befreundete Wege zusammenlaufen, da sieht die ganze Welt für V_/_ > eine Stunde wie eine Heimat aus. --- Herrmann Hesse > >_______________________________________________ >initscripts-ng-devel mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/initscripts-ng-devel > > > _______________________________________________ initscripts-ng-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/initscripts-ng-devel
