On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 14:09 -0700, Brynn wrote: > Oh no, I didn't see anything malicious either. But isn't this supposed to > be a gallery for Inkscape images? > > If any image is ok, as long as it's not malicious or advertising or nudity, > won't the gallery eventually lose its focus (along with its audience)? > (That cardboard castle image still annoys me. It's less about Inkscape than > this one! If this one actually has any connection.) > > Perhaps I'm missing something about this? But especially with space > apparently coming at a premium (BG 4 times in the last hour), won't the > gallery and website be better off without random non-Inkscape images?
We have no official policy on non-inkscape images. Part of the reason for having such a low quota (when it works) is to not have to mind so much about random images that aren't actually offensive. It's an attempt to reduce our workloads if you will. Martin, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Inkscape-docs mailing list Inkscape-docs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-docs
