Hi Brynn, Am 12.05.2017 um 12:27 schrieb brynn: > Hi Friends, > Since there have been no further comments regarding website > moderation policy, I've made the changes to the CoC that we discussed.
- It's not published yet, was that intentional or were you waiting for some confirmation? > Most of those who commented about being retroactive, thought > since the policy was not existing at the time, we should not delete > images uploaded before this date (or the members who uploaded them). > (So we can vote those old ones that I flagged, back in now.) - Done. There are still a couple of images where Martin voted to remove, but we didn't... those are stuck in the queue. > I started to put out a call for volunteer moderators (on the > To-Do List page, and also posting in forums and mailing lists) except I > wasn't sure about the wording. I was going to say something like > "Volunteers are needed to join the Website Team as Moderators." > > But then I realized there's no such thing as a Website Team, and > actually it's a Website Editors team....which I'm not sure if moderators > would be subset of editors... Hhmm, maybe so? - I'd say we can make one. Would you like to provide the icon? > Anyway, I seem to recall there was some mention of possibly > creating a Moderation Team. But before I post something like > "Volunteers are needed to form a/join the Website Moderation Team" maybe > we should decide if Moderators need their own team? > > This might be another subject, but pursuant to all the recent > discussion and movement towards getting the French manual translated, so > we can find update and expand it, I wonder if we need to think about a > Documentation Team? - I think it's not urgent, because communication might happen within the Booktype website (they have groups and chat). Generally, I believe it would be a good idea. > Since Martin is the website guru, he probably has an idea what > would be best here. Personally, I can't think of a reason for a formal > moderation team. But there may be one (or more), that make sense, that I > just never realized. - Permissions ;-) Maren > Thoughts, comments? > > All best, > brynn > > > -----Original Message----- From: brynn > Sent: Friday, May 05, 2017 10:04 AM > To: Inkscape-Devel ; Inkscape-Docs ; C R ; Maren Hachmann ; Martin Owens > ; Sylvain Chiron ; Eduard Braun > Subject: [Inkscape-docs] website moderation policy final > > Hi Friends, > It seems like this last message about moderation policy got > buried in > all the recent important chatter. So I'm re-sending the most vital > parts of it, > so we can finish this up. For convenience, > https://inkscape.org/community/coc/ > And here's the suggested change: > > In the Guidelines for User-Submitted Content section, replace > > "Art and other content submitted to the Inkscape website should adhere > to the > following rules:" > > with > > "Content uploaded to the gallery should be related to Inkscape (e.g. > created > with Inkscape, created for use with Inkscape, showing how to work with > Inkscape, > etc.). We reserve the right to remove any content that does not seem > appropriate > or does not adhere to the following obligatory rules:" > > C R said >> Little thing, but "created for use with Inkscape" could cover things > like just regular images... in fact it could cover just about > anything, even things made with Adobe Illustrator. I'd simply cut that > bit out. > > Hhmm.....yes, I see what you mean. My interpretation of that, is for > things > like extensions or filters. But maybe there's a better way to say it? > > What about "created to be installed in Inkscape"? Or maybe just "to be > installed in Inkscape"? That would eliminate any kind of image. Any other > suggestions out there? Eduard? > > I wonder about adding "Inkscape Project"? Such as: > "Content uploaded to the gallery should be related to Inkscape or the > Inkscape > Project (e.g. created...." > That would cover things like a website graphics or page mockup, board > meeting > transcript, etc. > > C R said >> If there's a significant amount of undesirable content currently, it's > probably best to make it retroactive. If it's just a few things, then > we should approach the owners about it. Not to be pushy, but to inform > them of the new policy. > > To me, it's a significant amount. By my estimate, probably 1 or 2 > thumbnails > per page of the gallery are random photos! So that's way too many to > consider > trying to contact them. > > Personally, I would love to delete them without notice. But since the > policy > was not available at the time they uploaded, technically I think it's > not fair > to delete them. But they'll soon be shuffled further and further back, > as the > gallery grows. I'm happy just to get the policy settled and put it into > effect. > > Thanks everyone for taking the time, and helping to finalize this > issue. As far > as I know, this will be the last step before we can start recruiting > moderators, > and using the system officially. > > All best, > brynn > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Inkscape-docs mailing list > Inkscape-docs@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-docs > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Inkscape-docs mailing list Inkscape-docs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-docs
