From: "Ariel Scolnicov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > It addects only C/grammar/grammar.pm. Is there any interest in this? > Would there be more interest if you could drop the argument names > (like you can in real C)? This is a terrible thing to do as it looses the purpose of the arguments (their names), keeping only their types. OTOH, it is perfectly legal as Ariel points out, so there you are. I'd have a strong talk with any programmer here at work who did this to us, but IMHO Inline should support this since it is legal C, even if discouraged. --binkley
- Patch to Inline::C to wrap declarations Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: Patch to Inline::C to wrap declarations B. K. Oxley \(binkley\)
- Re: Patch to Inline::C to wrap declarations Ned Konz
- Re: Patch to Inline::C to wrap declarations B. K. Oxley \(binkley\)
- Re: Patch to Inline::C to wrap declarations Brian Ingerson
- Re: Patch to Inline::C to wrap declarations Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: Patch to Inline::C to wrap declarations Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: Patch to Inline::C to wrap declarations Brian Ingerson
- Re: Patch to Inline::C to wrap declarations B. K. Oxley \(binkley\)
- Re: Patch to Inline::C to wrap declarations B. K. Oxley \(binkley\)
- Re: Patch to Inline::C to wrap declarations Neil Watkiss
- Re: Patch to Inline::C to wrap declarations Neil Watkiss
