Brian Ingerson wrote:
> > 2) There is a small but not completely insignificant startup penalty
> > when using Inline.
after perl is getting compiled to machine code instead of an intermediate
code it might make sense to rewrite all the inline modules so they
translate
into perl instead of translating into xs
So a module that uses inline to include its C parts will be easier to port
than a module that uses C parts. Although not a whole lot, since XS is
certainly well enough defined.
--
David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DWIM before autovivify unless strict
