On Saturday 02 June 2001 12:26 pm, Sam Tregar wrote: > All that said, there's no reason there couldn't be an Inline::Guile > and an Inline::DrScheme. That's why I decided against calling my > module Inline::Scheme - there's a lot more diversity of interpreters > out there than in Perl! Cool. What do you think about Inline::Scheme::Guile and Inline::Scheme::PLT? Brian, what would Inline think about this: use Inline Lang::Sublang => ...; --binkley
