On Sat, 27 Oct 2001 18:47:32 -0400 (EDT) Sam Tregar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I haven't tested it or anything. Should be fun to play with, especially for > > those on Windows with big libraries written in VB or something. I wonder if > > it supports COM and all that jazz.
Thanks for announcing, Neil! :) > Ah, looks like it's closer to Apple BASIC to me! It uses Language::BASIC > which appears to be a pure-Perl BASIC interpreter. Exactly. But as perldoc says, currently supported feature is only to define functions in Basic. I haven't thought of any interfaces other than that. Any suggestions are highly welcome. > Maybe Activestate should hire someone to produce Inline::VB? Or just skip > to Inline::C#? We already had pure perl C# parser :) http://search.cpan.org/search?dist=C-Sharp -- Tatsuhiko Miyagawa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
