On 10/12/01 22:34 +0100, Jochen Stenzel wrote: > >3/ I can't agree on the name. Inline::Yacc should be an interface to Yacc > >not the (gentle) monster you describe
I agree that Inline::Yacc should be the name for the Yacc only module.
> I have no problem with that, it's just a name. If "Inline::Yacc" should
> be reserved for inlining pure yacc it sounds ok.
How about Inline::Jacc?
Jochen's Alternative Compiler Compiler
Cheers, Brian
