On 22/01/02 08:51 -0600, Garrett Goebel wrote: > From: Sisyphus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > I was wondering if it was possible to use Inline to build a > > module in such a way that the module does *not* need the > > inline module. > > This is a TODO item for Inline 0.50
No Garrett. This is *THE* TODO item for 0.50. :-) After 0.50, modules that use Inline will automatically install a mini-Inline if there is no Inline on the users system. So your module will not technically require Inline. For now, I suggest making it dependent on Inline, instead of reworking it for XS. The beauty of Inline in this context is that the C code does not disappear after installation. So the user can go look at it and hack on it right out of her install tree. Just like with pure Perl! It looks like I'll have much more Inline hacking time after Feb 1. (But I've said that before so beware. NAPC looms...) Cheers, Brian
