On Wed, 6 Mar 2002 16:34:10 -0800, Neil Watkiss wrote: >Matthew O. Persico [06/03/02 19:28 -0500]: >>But seriously, I contemplated compiling the existing application >>without a "main" and making a dll out of it. I was wondering if >>anyone has already tried it. It may not even be possible. > >I've done it, but not with CVS. It requires the application to be >reasonably >separable. It's easy to do with programs where main.c only contains >some >initialization code and option parsing. I haven't seen the CVS >source code >though -- what's it like? > >Later, >Neil
At the risk of repeating myself (previous reply) I hadn't realized that the success of the endeavour hinged on the composition of the CVS code. I'm going to check that now and sign up for one of the cvs mail lists. Be back later with some comments. -- Matthew O. Persico
