On 01/07/02 19:34 +1000, Ken Williams wrote: > Hi, > > I recall a while ago I was attempting to build a distribution in > which there were several .pm modules that used Inline to embed > some C code, and to make a proper distribution it was necessary > to place each of these modules in their own directory, with > their own Makefile.PL. Is this still the case? > > Currently I'm building a wrapper for a set of C libraries > (http://www.neci.nj.nec.com/homepages/flake/nodelib/html/) > that's just begging to have one Perl class per C "class". This > means I'm going to have lots of Inline interfaces in lots of > files, and I'm hoping I don't have to give them each their own > directory in the distribution. I couldn't find any evidence to > the contrary in the docs, though.
Hi Ken, I think you're best off to use one directory per .pm. I'd like to see why this would be a pain. You'd pretty much need to do the same thing in XS. Of course, if you can convince me of a better way I'll do it for you :) Cheers, Brian
