On 19/10/02 12:59 -0600, Jason E. Stewart wrote:
> "Brian Ingerson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > One reason I never liked SWIG for Perl is because it's a non-CPAN
> > dependency. Now if we could package SWIG up as SWIG.pm, then we
> > could support something like:
> >
> > use Inline with => SWIG;
> > use Inline C;
> >
> > The SWIG.pm would pass in whatever extra parameters (like the
> > -shadow option) it wanted including the obvious "GLUE => SWIG".
>
> As long as we can build libswig.so turning it into SWIG.pm should be
> trivial.
FYI (mostly to the SWIG people),
We've added a way to override certain parts of the inlining process. The new
syntax is:
use Inline C => DATA =>
USING => 'GlueSwig';
Now Mitchell just needs to implement Inline::C::GlueSwig. :)
Cheers, Brian
