> > Performs the same function as make(1) but is written entirely > in > > perl. A subset of GNU make extensions is supported. For details > see > > Make for the underlying perl module. > > > > athough I still wonder why we are thinking about how to hack round > non > > portability in make, with perl programs communicating with other > perl > > programs via makefiles, when we could just ditch Makefiles > completely > > by integrate the MakeMaker and make stages. > > I think extending the make thing is easiest. Everything works > everywhere > already. I'm actually a big fan of extending legacy. The old > inventors were > no slouches. Writing something new is always easy for the first 80%. > After > that you start appreciating the legacy more and more :) > > I'd save retooling for Perl6 where you have to do it anyway.
Does that mean Inline::Make? mike ===== James Michael DuPont http://introspector.sourceforge.net/ __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/
