>>>>> "James" == James Michael Dupont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
James> Thanks for the interesting article. James> I like the clean and simple perl implementation. James> my experiments were with rmutt James> http://www.schneertz.com/rmutt/ Hmm. Wow. Yeah, that grammar is cooler. I've been giving some small thoughts to extending my grammar to include that. The problem is that they leave some stuff unspecified. Like when a rule adds a sub-grammar, how long is the scope? Does it stay in place once triggered, or revert after the rule? -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
