nadim wrote:
I remember that I pointed out a problem with Parse::RecDescent which was way too slow for any serious work (for me). One of the answers I got then was that Inline was made for "simple" stuff and in that case P::RD would be enough. I still fail to see why Inline would be for simple stuff.
Replacing P::RD with something faster is, imo, the most important improvement that could be made to Inline. (Yep - my Inline scripts have gotten big enough that the 'parse' stage is becoming quite a drag.) There was some discussion about a potential P::RD replacement candidate a couple of years ago wasn't there ? I forget what it was ....
I've also seen instances where people have expressed that view that Inline is for simple stuff .... though I've never seen any evidence to support it. Even with P::RD slowing it down, it seems to me that Inline is still capable of performing serious tasks.
Cheers, Rob
--
Any emails containing attachments will be deleted from my ISP's mail server before I even get to see them. If you wish to email me an attachment, please provide advance warning so that I can make the necessary arrangements.
