Yeah, I've seen this before, and it's very aggrivating.  Probably has
nothing to do with Inline, just C and perl.  I'm guessing memory is just
being initialized differently when you're running under the debugger.
My only suggestion is to insert print statements and try again. =/

 -Ken

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ira Woodhead [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 9:39 AM
> To: inline@perl.org
> Subject: segfaults and the perl debugger
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
> I'm working with Inline C and I have a segmentation fault 
> that occurs in certain easily reproduced conditions. I can't 
> seem to get any more specific error messages (such as where 
> the damn thing is happening) because when I put it into the 
> debugger, it doesn't happen! Everything seems to work 
> correctly if I simply call with -d and hit 'c' for continue. 
> 
> Anyone seen this? Is this a clue to something?
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> 
> PS: Happens on both linux x86 and intel macosx. I'm not that 
> bothered yet so I won't paste the pages of version info I 
> know I should. I'm just idly wondering if someone's seen this 
> kind of thing before.
>  
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 
>  
>  
> ATTENTION: DO NOT read, copy or disseminate this 
> communication unless you are the intended addressee. This 
> message and any file(s) or attachment(s) transmitted with it 
> are confidential, intended only for the named recipient, and 
> may contain information that is a trade secret, proprietary, 
> protected by the attorney work product doctrine, subject to 
> the attorney-client privilege, or is otherwise protected 
> against unauthorized use or disclosure. This message and any 
> file(s) or attachment(s) transmitted with it are transmitted 
> based on a reasonable expectation of privacy consistent with 
> ABA Formal Opinion No. 99-413. If you have received this 
> communication in error, please e-mail the sender and notify 
> the sender immediately that you have received the 
> communication in error. Thank you.
> 

Reply via email to