awesome! installed successfully in win7 64bit.

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Ingy dot Net <i...@ingy.net> wrote:

> Thanks Rob!
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Sisyphus <sisyph...@optusnet.com.au>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Inline-0.46_02 was uploaded to CPAN a few days ago.
> >
> > So far it has tested ok - 59 passes, no fails.
> > Unless something disastrous comes to light, I intend to release this as
> > 0.47 in a week or so (not before Jan 19). From the top-level Changes
> file:
> >
> > ##################################
> > ---
> > version: 0.46_02
> > date: Wed 5 January 2011
> >
> > ---
> > version: 0.46_02
> > date: Wed 29 December 2010
> > lib/Inline/MakeMaker.pm - apply patch from Raymond Mroz to accommodate
> the
> > modern
> >                         h2xs directory structure. Bump Inline::MakeMaker
> > version
> >                         to 0.45.
> >
> > ---
> > version: 0.46_01
> > date: Wed 31 March 2010 (and released to CPAN as 0.46_01)
> > Inline.pm - warn about untainting of Inline configuration info (where
> > applicable)
> >         - quieten non-numeric warnings in relation to devel releases
> >         - quieten uninitialized warning regarding $ENV{WIN64} that can
> > occur
> >           in certain circumstances on MS Windows
> > Inline.pod - Documentation change relating to introduction of further
> > _TESTING
> >            capabilities in Inline::C
> >
> > ---
> > version: 0.46_01
> > date: Mon 8 March 2010
> > Inline.pm - add '_TESTING' config option
> >         - hide the 'redefined' warning introduced by the fix to ticket
> > 49669,
> >           by placing the offending code in a 'no warnings "redefine";'
> > block.
> >         - bump require from 5.005 to 5.006
> >
> > ---
> > version: 0.46_01
> > date: Sun 14 feb 2010
> > Inline.pm - add archname and perlversion number to config filename.
> > C/C.pm - Second attempt at accommodating 'ccache cc' compiler (RT ticket
> > 40140).
> > ##################################
> >
> > and from the C/Changes file:
> >
> > ##################################
> > 0.46_02 Wed 5 Jan 2011 (released to CPAN as 0.46_01)
> >
> > 0.46_02 Sat 18 Dec 2010
> >     - Makefile.PL: insert 'return 1 if -e $_[0];' at beginning of
> >       find_executable() subroutine. (RT ticket 61218)
> >
> > 0.46_02 Sat 17 Apr 2010
> >     - C-Cookbook.pod: Fix callback example. (RT ticket 56652)
> >
> > 0.46_01 Wed 31 Mar 2010 (and released to CPAN as 0.46_01)
> >     - C.pm: local()ise $_ in get_types(). (RT ticket 55607)
> >     - C.pm: introduce capability to check that xs_bindings() is
> >        working as expected. (Prompted by RT ticket 55543)
> >     - C.pm: add _testing_cleanup() to facilitate cleaning up of
> >        files created by setting the _TESTING config option
> >     - t/08taint.t: Warn the user to expect "Blindly untainting ..."
> >        warnings
> >     - t/09parser.t: Make use of Inline::C::_testing_cleanup()
> >     - add t/10callback.t (mainly in response to RT ticket 55543) and
> >        t/11default_readonly.t (in response to RT ticket 55607).
> >
> > 0.46_01 Mon 8 Mar 2010
> >     - Add sub _parser_test() to C.pm (enables us to check which parser is
> > in
> >       use).
> >     - Add tests (C/t/09parser.t) to check that the expected parser is
> being
> >       used - makes use of '_TESTING' config option. (Involves minor
> changes
> >       to lib/Inline/C/ParseRecDescent.pm and
> lib/Inline/C/ParseRegExp.pm).
> >
> > 0.46_01 Sun 14 Feb 2010
> >     - Second attempt at accommodating 'ccache cc' compiler (RT ticket
> > 40140)
> > ##################################
> >
> > There are still some bug reports awaiting attention - either because of
> > degree of difficulty, or because of lack of follow-up from the OP, or
> > because I don't care about them. But it's nearly 12 months since the last
> > release, so I think now would be a good time to make official the changes
> > that have found their way into 0.46_02.
> >
> > If anyone here has specific requests for some changes prior to the
> release
> > of 0.47, now would be a good time to speak up :-)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Rob
> >
>

Reply via email to