Send inn-workers mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/inn-workers
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of inn-workers digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: INN 2.5.4 strange crash (Petr Novopashenniy)
2. Re: INN 2.5.4 strange crash (Petr Novopashenniy)
3. Re: INN 2.5.4 strange crash (Julien ?LIE)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 15:51:57 +0300 (MSK)
From: Petr Novopashenniy <[email protected]>
To: Julien ?LIE <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: INN 2.5.4 strange crash
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Julien ?LIE wrote:
[dd]
J?? Maybe you could change
J??
J?? void
J?? SCHANremove(CHANNEL *cp)
J?? {
J?? if (!CHANsleeping(cp))
J?? return;
J??
J?? to
J??
J?? void
J?? SCHANremove(CHANNEL *cp)
J?? {
J?? if (!CHANsleeping(cp)) {
J?? notice("%s was not sleeping", CHANname(cp));
J?? return;
J?? }
J??
J?? so as to verify that SCHANremove does the right thing when called after a
J?? "sleeping without Waker" warning?
J??
Thanks, I update my innd.
Today, I have same issue:
Feb 5 11:15:20 ns innd: innfeed-neva1!:63:proc:77050 cant write: Resource
temporarily unavailable
Feb 5 11:15:20 ns innd: innfeed-neva1!:63:proc:77050 blocked sleeping 5
Feb 5 11:15:20 ns innd: innfeed-neva1!:63:proc:77050 cant write: Resource
temporarily unavailable
Feb 5 11:15:20 ns innd: innfeed-neva1!:63:proc:77050 blocked sleeping 5
And have many "wakeup" messages.
I kill -TERM 77050:
Feb 5 11:45:47 ns innd: innfeed-neva1!:63:proc:77050 cant write: Broken
pipe
Feb 5 11:45:47 ns innd: innfeed-neva1!:63:proc:77050 closed lost 156
Feb 5 11:45:47 ns innd: free:-1 63 free but was in SMASK
[dd]
Feb 5 11:45:57 ns innfeed[77050]: ME global seconds 30356 offered 1215616
accepted 237616 refused 954386 rejected 21842 missing 7 accsize 7373594682
rejsize
297932642 spooled 634871 unspooled 117
Feb 5 11:45:57 ns innfeed[77050]: ME finishing at Thu Feb 05 11:45:57
2015
Feb 5 11:45:58 ns innd: innfeed-neva1! exit 0 elapsed 30352 pid 77050
Feb 5 11:45:58 ns innd: innfeed-neva1!:35:file closed lost 19701
After that innfeed-neva1 restart and works fine.
No "sleeping without Waker" messages in my logs.
--pety
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 18:47:48 +0300 (MSK)
From: Petr Novopashenniy <[email protected]>
To: Julien ?LIE <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: INN 2.5.4 strange crash
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Julien ?LIE wrote:
[dd]
J?? Maybe you could change
J??
J?? void
J?? SCHANremove(CHANNEL *cp)
J?? {
J?? if (!CHANsleeping(cp))
J?? return;
J??
J?? to
J??
J?? void
J?? SCHANremove(CHANNEL *cp)
J?? {
J?? if (!CHANsleeping(cp)) {
J?? notice("%s was not sleeping", CHANname(cp));
J?? return;
J?? }
J??
J?? so as to verify that SCHANremove does the right thing when called after a
J?? "sleeping without Waker" warning?
J??
I see "was not sleeping" for all peers (many times per second) after start
patched innd.
--pety
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 21:51:19 +0100
From: Julien ?LIE <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: INN 2.5.4 strange crash
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Hi Petr,
> J?? if (!CHANsleeping(cp)) {
> J?? notice("%s was not sleeping", CHANname(cp));
> J?? return;
> J?? }
>
> I see "was not sleeping" for all peers (many times per second) after start
> patched innd.
The interesting stuff is whether the line "was not sleeping" occurs after
"sleeping without Waker". If it occurs for the same peer, it is abnormal
and would explain that SCHANremove does not remove the sleeping state.
> Feb 5 11:15:20 ns innd: innfeed-neva1!:63:proc:77050 cant write: Resource
> temporarily unavailable
> Feb 5 11:15:20 ns innd: innfeed-neva1!:63:proc:77050 blocked sleeping 5
> Feb 5 11:15:20 ns innd: innfeed-neva1!:63:proc:77050 cant write: Resource
> temporarily unavailable
> Feb 5 11:15:20 ns innd: innfeed-neva1!:63:proc:77050 blocked sleeping 5
>
> And have many "wakeup" messages.
Incidentally, these EAGAIN errors are very frequent on your server.
Don't you have issues with other programs? Is it only happening with INN?
--
Julien ?LIE
? Il ne faut jamais parler s?chement ? un Numide. ? (Ast?rix)
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
inn-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/inn-workers
End of inn-workers Digest, Vol 69, Issue 4
******************************************
