Send inn-workers mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/inn-workers
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of inn-workers digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: INN 2.6.0 release candidate (Noel Butler)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 19:57:09 +1000
From: Noel Butler <[email protected]>
To: Julien ?LIE <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: INN 2.6.0 release candidate
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On 23/04/2015 17:57, Julien ?LIE wrote:
>> not a big problem but I would include this caveat in any release
>> announcement for 2.6.0.
>
> The caveat will be included at the beginning of the announcement:
>
> "The name and location of the pullnews configuration file have changed. It is
> now pullnews.marks, located in pathdb when pullnews is run as the news user,
> or otherwise in the running user's home directory. This file was previously
> stored in .pullnews in the running user's home directory (even for the news
> user). If you use pullnews, you need to manually move and rename the
> configuration file; otherwise, it will no longer work. Note that the -c flag
> passed to pullnews allows to specify another configuration file, if need be."
Thats perfect :)
> I note 'make update' did not install the newer man pages
> That's strange. Are you sure the directory where the newer
> man pages are is in your path?
>
> Could you please run "make -?n update"? (the "-?n" flag will prevent
> make from doing anything; it will just print the commands it would run)
Thats says it installed them, no idea why it didnt show current when I
looked at pullnews, tonight man says its right one from 2015, so, all
seems good with 2.6, from initial tests I didnt have to alter nnrpd
filter, shows anonymous still on test server, so should be all good if
it was allowed to go upstream - which for obvious reasons, its not :)
so, from me, for my purposes, a +1 for release of 2.6.0
( we have pullnews keep it up to date once a week, so when we commit to
change over from server_x to inn for live use - likely this year, we
wont have to wait 3 weeks syncing data lol)
Cheers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/inn-workers/attachments/20150424/bbe1e2db/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
inn-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/inn-workers
End of inn-workers Digest, Vol 71, Issue 6
******************************************
