Hi Brad, Yes, that's something I forgot when doing the reviews, too, but I think the ThreadedImageRegionPartitioner would also greatly benefit from the new image splitting architecture. Please let me know if you would like be to write a patch or perform a review.
Thanks, Matt On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Bradley Lowekamp <[email protected]> wrote: > Matt, > > I apologize for not being more familiar with your DomainThreader contribution. > > Just yesterday I merged what I thought should be the last patch to > consolidate all the ImageSplitting that occurred in ITK in the ImageIO, > ImageSource Threading and the StreamingImageFilter, but it appears that I > left one out. The ThreadedImageRegionPartitioner[1]. > > It would certainly be quite beneficial for the DomainThreader to take > advantage of different image splitting algorithms currently available, as > well as just being able to implement the image splitting algorithm one and > being able to use it in all sorts of places in ITK would be great. > > Please let me know what your thoughts are on how to reduce this redundant > code and make the ImageDomain Threader more modular. > > Thanks, > Brad > > [1] > https://github.com/Kitware/ITK/blob/master/Modules/Core/Common/include/itkThreadedImageRegionPartitioner.hxx > > _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit: http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at: http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
