Hans,

That improvement sounds amazing! I look forward to seeing this patch!


Kent,

Just to follow up with my comment. I had previous done just about the same 
thing Hans did in his patch to the v3 MattesMutualInformation. I was suggesting 
using the same convention I did there. Specifically what was done here:

https://github.com/Kitware/ITK/blob/master/Modules/Registration/Common/include/itkMattesMutualInformationImageToImageMetric.h#L345

This is not the best way to do it, but if we do it this way consistently, when 
we come up with a better technique they can be easily all upgraded.

Thanks,
Brad

On Sep 24, 2013, at 9:55 AM, "Johnson, Hans J" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Kent,
> 
> I'm at the MICCAI conference and was able to do some diagnosis in the down
> time today.  I believe that I have a patch that DRASTICALLY improves the
> performance of the test case while preserving the numerical results.
> 
> Old   Code 3414 seconds
> Fixed Code   90 seconds  <-- Yes 90 seconds.
> 
> It's late here in Japan, so I need to do some more validation and style
> cleanup, but I hope to submit a patch tomorrow.
> 
> What I need from you today is that you address the comment in the gerrit
> patch I pushed over the weekend.  Matt and Brad both had comments on ways
> to improve style for consistency.  Once you have a new pull request in
> place, I'll rebase my changes on those.
> 
> Hans
> 
> On 9/24/13 10:49 PM, "Williams, Norman K" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> This is interesting diagnostic work.
>> 
>> If the problem is threads sharing a smart pointer to a transform, could
>> they instead share a plain old const pointer to the transform?  The
>> threads aren't all modifying the transform, are they?
>> --
>> Kent Williams [email protected]
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the 
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential 
> and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you 
> are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or 
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the 
> sender that you have received the message in error, then delete it.  Thank 
> you.
> ________________________________

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers

Reply via email to