Brad, THANKS. A gerrit patch is being created.
I remove all the integer base complex types because they were never used. Also, I determined that it is highly likely that those types were simply copy/paste paradigm of other macro wrappings where integer types do make sense. Also as a side note from my previous example clang++ x.cpp o test <‹ FAILED to compile clang++ x.cpp o test -stdlib=libstdc++ <‹ PASSED COMPLIATION Thanks, Hans From: Bradley Lowekamp <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 at 8:21 PM To: Hans Johnson <[email protected]> Cc: ITK <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Compliance problem with Mac On Oct 30, 2013, at 8:30 PM, Hans Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: std::complex<unsigned long> I don't believe the above is valid. http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/complex/complex/ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11108587/why-does-abscomplexint-always-r eturn-zero Brad ________________________________ Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, then delete it. Thank you. ________________________________ _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit: http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at: http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
