On Jan 16, 2014, at 3:50 PM, Matt McCormick <[email protected]> wrote:
> And, as Brad K. and > Luis point out, a second-class-citizen Review designation is proven > not to work well. It's was not clear to me that a separate group for contributions was proven not to work. Certainly referring to it despairingly as "second-class" is not inspiring. Specifically what were the problems, from the previous Review? Additionally, How is steering new contributions into remote modules, not creating a tiered system? These remote modules just seem difficult to review/test/maintain. The my primary suggestion of the Contrib was to establish a place of the same tier no matter where the code was. This has been a constructive and productive thread, thanks everyone. Brad
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit: http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at: http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
