Hi, Le 23/10/2015 18:43, David Cole via Insight-developers a écrit : > The itkTransformTest is the only test failing on my Visual Studio 2013 > Debug dashboard because of this code:
What is the exact error produced when your run the test in verbose mode? > The problem is in the Fill implementation: > > template< typename TValue > > void VariableLengthVector< TValue > > ::Fill(TValue const & v) ITK_NOEXCEPT > { > std::fill_n(&this->m_Data[0], m_NumElements, v); > } > > In this test call, m_Data is nullptr, and m_NumElements is 0, so > clearly,&m_Data[0] is not a useful pointer, and with 0 elements, there > is nothing to fill. > > So.... should the implementation of Fill be changed to be conditional > on the pointer being non-nullptr, or the number of elements being > non-zero, or both? (Are other Fill implementations protected like so?) > > Or should the test be changed to avoid calling Fill when there are no > elements...? I'd say that this is a bug in std::fill_n (or something related to the STL being in CHECKED MODE) and that we should fall back into a plain loop. We should avoid adding such defensive tests (if (!empty) fill_n()). I can take care of this issue (only on Monday). If you don't mind, I'd rather avoid rebasing yet another time and first go through http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/20253/10 (I could also fix the issue I've introduced in my first patch on VLV in this patch, but this is not the usual patching policy if I understand correctly) Regards, -- Luc Hermitte _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit: http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at: http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers