Hi all,
I found your last email confusing Andrew.  I'm not sure what you are trying
to get at.  However, let me see if I can make myself a little more explicit.
What do people mean when they say they are hurting about UCA Assembly
resolution 84?  Nothing has changed, so why are people claiming to hurt?  It
has to be from within that they are hurting.  What is the nature of their
hurt?  Is it the sort of hurt that comes from not getting your own way in
things?  I confess, I am not hurting.  My mind is active and seeking to find
a way through the division that has surfaced consequent to this resolution
being made public.
I suspect that for some the hurt is internal and comes from the perception
of being associated with a church that does not take the Bible literally.
What if the Bible isn't the authority that I have imagined it to be?  Where
does that leave me?  But what if they are wrong and I am associated with
such a church; what will others think of me?
For some it will surely be the feelings of hurt that arise when we feel we
have been excluded from the fellowship for reasons that appear to be beyond
our control.
In both cases people are being led by their feelings and are either refusing
or finding it impossible to understand the feelings of others.  To recognise
our own feelings is essential, but to be led by them is disastrous.  I
believe it is the path to hell.  (There's an opening for someone) Read
Anthony de Mello's "Awareness".
While Jesus seems to be in touch with his own feelings he is also very aware
of the feelings of others.  But he doesn't ask us to feel good or even do
those things that will make us feel good.  He asks us to love our enemies,
do good to those who persecute us and follow him on the way that leads to a
cross.  That is quite clearly not about being led by our feelings.
In a world where a half of the population lives in abject poverty (existing
on the equivalent of $2 a day or less but with no certainty of a meal the
next day) I believe our argument about whether the Bible is literally true
is an indulgence we cannot afford.  I could say that much more strongly but
will desist for the moment.
However you regard the Bible it still says that what we do to others is what
we are doing to God and that our first priority is to care for the oppressed
and downtrodden.  The call for justice reverberates through both Old and New
Testaments.  That includes acceptance of those who are different from us and
caring for those who are hurting.  This is much more important than having
some mythical church that is pure and unadulterated.
If we in the church want to be recognised as Christians, let us love one
another for that is the only hallmark that God will recognise.
Peter.
Peter & Jan Elliott
26 Crowe Place
Cootamundra  NSW  2590
Phone: 02 6942 1212 

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to