In that case, Stephen, you're young enough that I don't have to apologise for asking that personal question :-) In fact, you're young enough to be inflating your age, so we'll assume you're really only 18 and 8 months.

Clare
PS. Lindsay hasn't lapsed into offended silence; he has difficulty accessing email on the weekend. But I'm sure he'll appreciate your apology :-)



Stephen Webb wrote:


Tom said off list:

I figured on an email list you could be whatever age you like!
Tom




In that case, Tom and Clare, I'm 19. And sorry, Lindsay, for being so disrespectful!

Cheers,


Stephen



Dear Clare,


I thought you would know better. An email list is not the place to be asking such personal questions!

SW

Clare Pascoe Henderson wrote:

So how old are *you*, Stephen, if you're calling Lindsay young?? :-)

Clare

Stephen Webb wrote:


It's all relative, dear boy!


SW

Lindsay Brash wrote:


G'day All,


Stephen, I like the idea (if handled well), and it's nice that I qualify on age, but couldn't help thinking that it is a sign of the times in the church that young = under 40. When I were a lad, young meant young :-)

Kind regards,
Lindsay Brash.




------------------------------------------------------ - You are subscribed to the mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put in the message body 'unsubscribe insights-l' (ell, not one (1)) See: http://nsw.uca.org.au/insights-l-information.htm ------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to