Will Fiveash wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 01:56:54PM -0700, Danek Duvall wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:39:19PM -0500, Will Fiveash wrote: >> >>> I guess I disagree. If there were a -h for extra humor in the output >>> then I wouldn't have a problem. >> Lack of humor is a bug. Seriously (or not), when did professionalism start >> to mean humorless? Can't tune a fish, man. > > My issue is that we are talking about the utility that verifies the > integrity of the packages installed on a system. Using -v reports a > bogus error and could possibly alarm a customer which in turn could > either waste Sustaining's time or generate questions about the > professionalism of opensolaris development. Now, I enjoy an "easter > egg" but I don't think this one is appropriate.
And as I already pointed out, it's not supposed to show up as an error, we already have a bug for that. It's just supposed to show up as a harmless bit of text, so verify would not fail and humour remains safely intact ;) Cheers, -- Shawn Walker
