On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 01:00:17PM -0700, Danek Duvall wrote:
> Will Fiveash wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 02:31:10PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
> >
> > >  Yes, because entire is just an incorporation that constrains the 
> > > versions of 
> > >  the packages that can be or are installed.  In comparison, 
> > > redistributable 
> > >  is a 'group package' that has all of its packages as required 
> > > dependencies.
> > 
> > Mmm, I find your description of entire a bit confusing when you write
> > "that can be".  I interpret that to mean that it would install packages
> > listed in its contents that are not currently installed which is
> > different behavior than what I previously described.
> 
> An incorporation is a package that contains constraints on other packages
> (in the form of "incorporate"-type dependencies).  A constraint doesn't
> cause another package to be installed, it merely states that if a
> constrained package is to be installed, it must be installed at a version
> that matches the version in the constraint.

Okay, I get it now.  Is the description of entire, redistributable and
other similar packages documented somewhere on opensolaris.org?

-- 
Will Fiveash
Sun Microsystems               Office x64079/512-401-1079
Austin, TX, 78727              (TZ=CST6CDT), USA
Internal Solaris Kerberos/GSS/SASL website: http://kerberos.sfbay.sun.com
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/kerberos/

Reply via email to