* Dave Miner (Dave.Miner at Sun.COM) wrote: > Folks, > > The OGB elections will be coming up soon, and with that it's time for a > review of core contributor grants, which are still required in order to > vote in the community elections[1]. The current list of core > contributors for this community is: > > dminer Dave Miner Expires: 2009-02-24 00:32:45 > equach Ethan Quach Expires: 2009-02-24 00:32:45 > glagasse Glenn Lagasse Expires: 2009-02-24 00:32:45 > carlsonj James D. Carlson Expires: 2009-02-24 00:32:45 > dambi Jan Damborsky Expires: 2009-02-24 00:32:45 > ptribble Peter Tribble Expires: 2009-02-24 00:32:45 > nadkarni Sanjay G. Nadkarni Expires: 2009-02-24 00:32:45 > sjelinek Sarah J. Jelinek Expires: 2009-02-24 00:32:45 > ysundar Sundar Yamunachari Expires: 2009-02-24 00:32:45 > tsk Tim S. Knitter Expires: 2009-02-24 00:32:45 > > We didn't update this last year, so the above are all set to expire. I > propose renewing the core contributor grants for all of the above > individuals.
+1 for renewing all of the above, myself included (I accept). > In addition, I'd like to nominate the following based on contributions > to either the Caiman or IPS projects, which are the principal current > activities sponsored by this community: > > aalok Alok Aggarwal > barts Bart Smaalders > bpytlik Brock Pytlik > clayb Clay Baenziger > comay David Comay > dduvall Danek Duvall > dp Daniel B. Price > evanl Evan J. Layton > ginnie Ginnie Wray > jeanm Jean E. McCormack > joev Joseph VLcek > johansen johansen > ktung Karen W. Tung > mwaterl Moriah Waterland > sch Stephen Hahn > schwartz Jack A. Schwartz > sohn Susan Sohn > swalker Shawn Walker > tmueller Tom Mueller > wmsch William Schumann > > If I've overlooked someone you think should be nominated (including > yourself ;-) please speak up. > > For approval, each nominee must receive +1's (votes in favor) from at > least 3 existing Core Contributors, and no -1's (votes against) from any > existing Core Contributors, as well as accept their election. > > I vote +1 for all of the above. I also vote +1 for all of the above. -- Glenn
