Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter writes: > Thanks. Actually, you reached the point. My concern is because the latest > copy containts all data (look the size):
That's because it uses ZFS copy-on-write features to speed things up. Deleting the "big" -5 BE will cause the bulk of the storage to be attributed to the "apparently small" -4 BE. I agree that it looks a little confusing. > I suppose to be safe, and everything should be ok on next book. At least, I > hope. Yep. You did the right thing. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
