James Carlson wrote: > Joseph Mocker writes: > >> James Carlson wrote: >> >>> Careful: using an NFS client on the same box as the corresponding NFS >>> server (e.g., having a non-global zone as a client of the global zone) >>> is known to be toxic. >>> >>> >> Gah! really? Any pointers? >> > > CR 4498652 would be a good start. > Fascinating CR which I don't fully understand. However the CR is in regards to UFS and NFS. In my case the server would be sharing ZFS filesystems, so I would guess at least this bug would not be involved. Other, perhaps undiscovered bugs may apply though. > >> Perhaps it will be sufficient short term to >> at least to the lu w/ minimal downtime. >> Unless you have any thoughts for other workarounds. >> > > Getting a fix for the LU bug seems like a good answer. > > Yes, of course. A fix for the bug is the best answer, was just looking for something in which I could accomplish an LU until then.
--joe
