So far Peter Tribble, James Carlson, and Shawn Walker have voted in favor. The one vote against, Peter Tribble reversed his position after it was made clear that the intent of this Project is to investigate Conary as a standard packaging and distribution framework for OpenSolaris a project to make it the standard packaging system.
At this point what do we need to do to present this project to the OGB? (I think the OGB facilitator for install-discuss needs to help here). Thanks, Brian P.S. - Please continue to vote, as multiple endorsements are helpful. On 10/1/07, Peter Tribble <peter.tribble at gmail.com> wrote: > On 10/1/07, Brandorr <brandorr at opensolaris.org> wrote: > > On 9/30/07, Peter Tribble <peter.tribble at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 9/28/07, Brandorr <brandorr at opensolaris.org> wrote: > > > > > Proposal: Adopt Conary as the standard packaging and distribution > > > > > framework for OpenSolaris. > > > > > > I can't agree to that request. For one. it involves making a snap > > > decision, > > > and I simply don't think we can just go ahead and do that. > > > > You are right, I guess I want to make sure it gets a fair shake and I > > don't know how to phrase that.` > > I think all you need to do is replace "Adopt" with "Investigate", which > may well be what you meant anyway. Such a revised proposal would get > a +1 from me. > > -- > -Peter Tribble > http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/ > -- - Brian Gupta http://opensolaris.org/os/project/nycosug/
