Excellent document; the author has nailed it.

However, if I may add two things, which concern me regarding the document:

1. with an increased acceptance of Solaris, I believe that automated installs 
in the form of flash + JumpStart combination will become the preferred way to 
install; this combination is already a defacto standard in large enterprises 
that already have the necessary Solaris expertise.

However, one weak point of this approach remains to be the DHCP and PXE.  While 
DHCP installations provide a platform independent booting environment on both 
SPARC and i86pc (via PXE), it is currently very painful to implement a DHCP 
server properly.

I've been working with Solaris for more than ten years now, most of which were 
spent as either a sysadmin or as a system engineer, and I feel that DHCP server 
which supports booting / installation via JumpStart is very difficult to 
properly configure; furthermore, it is overly complicated.

May I therefore suggest to the author of the paper, to revisit the DHCP problem?


2. and I quote:

"Unlike the existing Solaris installer, the user will not be asked to select 
slices and mount
points for a more detailed filesystem layout. This is because the default 
installation will use
ZFS pools and filesystems to construct the basic filesystem layout. Advanced 
user options
will allow the continued use of UFS as the installation filesystem for those 
customers who
require it, but our direction is to de-emphasize this legacy technology. The 
usage of ZFS as
the default filesystem simplifies our ability to offer safe patching and 
upgrades with
rollback, and will allow for faster provisioning of zones."

Exactly this has been my concern throughout the author's essay: while I agree 
that Solaris will benefit from an easier installer, I suggest that there are 
also "Advanced" buttons for system administrators which enable one to configure 
the installation exactly as one sees fit, i.e.:

I don't want the installer being "smart" and deciding for me how many ZFS pools 
or which FileSystems to configure on top of ZFS; same goes for UFS FileSystems. 
What I do want and need is very fine grained control over that.  I feel that 
this is critical for an advanced installation.
--
This messages posted from opensolaris.org

Reply via email to