>While the solution we chose did introduce some bugs, it also avoided >others and is actually reasonably high performance.
And it raises about a call a week because people are confused by this. (Or creates an email question on a Solaris forum, etc) By that standard, I'd call it a bad implementation. That fact that people could lose system specified ld.so config properties would be a bug; not a showstopper in implementing such a solution. People were screaming it was a bad solution and that it would break stuff; the project team did not even investigate; and it keeps on breaking stuff. Casper
