I think right way to define packages is DU created not for one file but for set 
of files which represents certain "service". This "service" is not formal 
definition so it allows as some flexibility to define packages in reasonable 
practical way. For example we may have service "Standard Unix Utilities" which 
will include ls, cat, grep, etc...

However with non formal definition of services, which combines some files in a 
set,  after this done it is pretty clear what need to be done to create DU for 
it - how to make package for this service so this service then can be delivered 
independently from other unrelated independent services, but with all other 
necessary packages this one depends on.

vassun
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org

Reply via email to