Adrian Florea wrote: > I think is doing this because the / filesystem is > built on top of a metadevice (that is a mirror) > consisting of a single submirror (i.e. built on a > single slice). > Actually, the 1 way mirror shouldn't matter. A 1 way mirror is legal and should mount ok. My suggestion would be to try this using the underlying slice name, not the SVM metadevice name. Could be a problem with SVM for some reason. If it works when you specify the underlying slice name then we can start to debug this with the SVM folks.
sarah ***** > So you can try one of: > > - try to have / on a correctly setup two way mirror > and then LU (I did this on SPARC without problems, on > Solaris 10) > > - don't use mirror for / if is built on only one > slice. > > > maybe this helps, > Adrian > > > --- Moritz Willers <mo at wit.ch> wrote: > > >> thanks for the suggestion, but nope. Exactly the >> same. >> >> # lucreate -c snv_40 -n snv_46 -C /dev/dsk/c2d0s0 -m >> /:/dev/md/dsk/ >> d30:ufs >> .. >> Integrity check OK. >> Populating contents of mount point </>. >> Copying. >> Creating shared file system mount points. >> Creating compare databases for boot environment >> <snv_46>. >> Creating compare database for file system </>. >> Updating compare databases on boot environment >> <snv_46>. >> Making boot environment <snv_46> bootable. >> Updating bootenv.rc on ABE <snv_46>. >> Generating partition and slice information for ABE >> <snv_46> >> Setting root slice to Solaris Volume Manager >> metadevice </dev/md/dsk/ >> d30>. >> mount: /dev/md/dsk/d10 write-protected >> ERROR: Cannot mount boot slice </dev/md/dsk/d10>. >> Cannot update GRUB >> menu >> ERROR: Unable to delete GRUB menu entry for boot >> environment <snv_46>. >> ERROR: Cannot make file systems for boot environment >> <snv_46>. >> wicked# df / >> / (/dev/md/dsk/d40 ):17123206 >> blocks 1184519 files >> wicked# metastat -p d40 >> d40 -m /dev/md/rdsk/d10 1d10 1 1 /dev/rdsk/c2d0s0 >> >> guess it's time to try without DiskSuite. What's >> going to break >> next, though? Would I'd better of abandoning LU? >> >> What other option would I have to keep my >> OpenSolaris system up to >> date, that would not involve burning a DVD on a >> regular basis and >> booting of that to upgrade, nor having a second >> netboot/install >> server on the home network? >> >> - mo >> >> On 29 Aug 2006, at 19:52, Dave Miner wrote: >> >> >>> I suspect it's a bug in handling the 'preserve' >>> >> option, which I >> >>> don't think gets exercised all that widely - I >>> >> don't personally >> >>> know anyone who uses it on a regular basis. I >>> >> would guess that the >> >>> lucreate without that would work fine and you'd be >>> >> on your way, >> >>> though obviously it'll take the time to copy the >>> >> data. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> install-discuss mailing list >> install-discuss at opensolaris.org >> >> > http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/install-discuss > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > install-discuss mailing list > install-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/install-discuss > >
