I accept this election.

joev - Joseph VLcek

Dave Miner wrote:
> <div class="moz-text-flowed" style="font-family: -moz-fixed">Folks,
> 
> The OGB elections will be coming up soon, and with that it's time for a 
> review of core contributor grants, which are still required in order to 
> vote in the community elections[1].  The current list of core 
> contributors for this community is:
> 
> dminer    Dave Miner    Expires: 2009-02-24 00:32:45
> equach    Ethan Quach    Expires: 2009-02-24 00:32:45
> glagasse  Glenn Lagasse    Expires: 2009-02-24 00:32:45
> carlsonj  James D. Carlson    Expires: 2009-02-24 00:32:45
> dambi  Jan Damborsky    Expires: 2009-02-24 00:32:45
> ptribble  Peter Tribble    Expires: 2009-02-24 00:32:45
> nadkarni  Sanjay G. Nadkarni    Expires: 2009-02-24 00:32:45
> sjelinek  Sarah J. Jelinek    Expires: 2009-02-24 00:32:45
> ysundar  Sundar Yamunachari    Expires: 2009-02-24 00:32:45
> tsk Tim S. Knitter    Expires: 2009-02-24 00:32:45
> 
> We didn't update this last year, so the above are all set to expire.  I 
> propose renewing the core contributor grants for all of the above 
> individuals.
> 
> In addition, I'd like to nominate the following based on contributions 
> to either the Caiman or IPS projects, which are the principal current 
> activities sponsored by this community:
> 
> aalok    Alok Aggarwal
> barts    Bart Smaalders
> bpytlik    Brock Pytlik
> clayb    Clay Baenziger
> comay    David Comay
> dduvall    Danek Duvall
> dp    Daniel B. Price
> evanl    Evan J. Layton
> ginnie    Ginnie Wray
> jeanm    Jean E. McCormack
> joev    Joseph VLcek
> johansen    johansen
> ktung    Karen W. Tung
> mwaterl    Moriah Waterland
> sch    Stephen Hahn
> schwartz    Jack A. Schwartz
> sohn    Susan Sohn
> swalker    Shawn Walker
> tmueller    Tom Mueller
> wmsch    William Schumann
> 
> If I've overlooked someone you think should be nominated (including 
> yourself ;-) please speak up.
> 
> For approval, each nominee must receive +1's (votes in favor) from at
> least 3 existing Core Contributors, and no -1's (votes against) from any
> existing Core Contributors, as well as accept their election.
> 
> I vote +1 for all of the above.
> 
> Dave
> 
> [1] At least until the OGB finishes their overhaul of the constitution, 
> see the OGB page for information on what's happening there.
> 
> </div>


Reply via email to