Glynn Foster writes: > get to something tangible. The cost for creating a new project on > opensolaris.org is extremely low, and all this discussion is doing is > providing > massive stop energy to the project team.
Dunno about that. In terms of actual votes, have you seen anyone say anything other than "+1" to the proposal? I haven't. Given the rotten state of packaging and patching, and relatively large number of people who've had encounters with it, I think it would be surprising if nobody had opinions about how it ought to be solved. In any event, what I was saying was that, in my experience, it's harder to attract people to a project that's advertising a set of already-made decisions, even if those are known to be good answers, than it is to attract people to a less-fixed project. Perhaps your experience may differ here, but I don't think it's necessary to accuse those commenting on this proposal of "providing massive stop energy" ... whatever it is that might mean. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
