David John Burrowes wrote:
> I'm not necessarily the target market for Solaris... so take my
> comments with a grain of salt.
> 
> Still, some competitive info at this moment in time: - The WinXP
> installers I've worked with install all locale info, but the Asian
> stuff isn't enabled (and thus I assume compressed somewhere in the
> installation on the hard disk) by default - In the Mac 10.3 installer
> (I forget about 10.4) the east asian locales were not installed by
> default.
> 
> From the experiential standpoint:
> I am a user who uses multiple input methods for multiple languages,
> and so I'm used to having to dig around to install my needed
> languages.  I understand the concerns for disk space which I assume
> are the primary motivation for the points above.  I doubt the
> installation times are so different as to cause me grief (maybe 32 vs
> 30min, at worst :-), so I accept the pain the vendors put me through.
> (the current Solaris installer does make it a bit of a nuisance for
> me to say "give me all" though)
> 
> At the same time, it frustrates me when I walk up to a system and the
> user didn't put the locale I need on the system.  It isn't hard for
> me to rectify this on Windows, but I do hate mucking with someone's
> setup just so I can type "hi" to someone. :-) (but, as a technical
> person, I understand I'm just being bitten by someone's now-outdated
> concern about saving disk space)
> 

I don't know that it's an outdated concern yet.  Brian Yuan's numbers 
indicate a 10-20% space increase over a full install to add all the 
locales if we did it right now; that's a large enough number that I 
can't just consider it an easy choice.  But the Windows compression 
scheme you mention is a creative way of addressing it.  We can think 
about some options like that.

> Strategic concern: My sense is that the world is getting smaller, and
> we definitely want more and more folks to be adopting and using
> OpenSolaris all around the world. To me, that suggests that having
> all the locales there by default (or getting them there very easily)
> is strategically important.
> 
> Practical point: At this point, the desktop experience is not fully
> localized. Last I saw there's a special separate version of
> OpenOffice for east asian locales.
> 
> I don't mean with this post to suggest a particular direction for
> localization issues. I just wanted to add them to the pot of issues
> to consier.
> 

Yeah, we definitely will need to consider it.  I agree that the world is 
getting smaller and the expectations in this area are getting higher, so 
I don't expect we'll just go with the status quo.

Dave

Reply via email to