> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, Gary Mills wrote: > > > I keep getting e-mail reports on two bug reports > that > > I filed, but when I look them up, all I find are > very old > > copies with no recent changes. These are: > > > > 6661895 /etc/sfw/openssl/certs has no well known CA > certificates > > 6823465 Option parsing typo in /etc/lib/lu/lusync > > > > Is there some other place I should be looking? > > As you don't say where you looked to begin with, it's > hard to say :-)
Everywhere I could find, I suppose. > I see the openssl bug here: > http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bu > g_id=6661895 That one hasn't been updated for almost two years. > and all of the public information is there. There are > a few other > updates that have happened, but those were to > internal only fields > (such as evaluation and interest list). There does > seem to be a > lot of "discussion" in that bug that should probably > be in the > Public Comments field (so it will be visible > externally). I'll > mail those that have updated the private fields and > see if they will > say more openly. Yes, I'd like to see that part. > Dave already noted that LU is not being supported as > part of OpenSolaris, > which would probably explain why that bug is not > visible on opensolaris.org. Okay. It was a Nevada and Solaris 10 bug originally. I realize that `beadm' is the replacement. It works nicely for me on Opensolaris. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org
