On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:31:03 -0600, Philip Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you going to continue support for Madeleine or is AR going to > replace it? I > like the Madeleine version as it really is simple to setup and use. The > generate > HTML pages is the perfect feature for my site. I've spent too many years > writing > HTML and want a quick way to create pages. Hi, Let me jump the topic. I've used Instiki with Madeleine on my Debian PC only to generate HTML pages for the WWW server/Internet router in our local housing estate network. See http://warpman.kv.net.pl. It's all Instiki site. The plans were ambituous but Instiki started to choke as pages number increased. So, if AR version were more potent for the job of my wiki/blog I'd be all for it. But as I stumbled on many snags in using AR (I wrote on it to the list earlier) I'd like to know the development timeline of AR or should I go for WordPress? I must admit I want my texts under my control not on someone's server. Installing Instiki Madeleine on Debian Sarge 3.1r1 was a snap. What about the future Instiki AR version? Cheers, warpman (Przemysław Pawełczyk) -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ _______________________________________________ Instiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/instiki-users
