seriously mate - whoever you are i know all about etiquette i just chose to use it when i see fit. which is not now. thanks for the advice though... i didnt call the guy a prick and a cocksucker because he didnt answer my original post i called him a prick because he thinks he can police email lists and feels its his job to... in fact for exactly the same reason im going to call you a prick now. prick.
apologise for what ? On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 3:47 AM, Mike Payson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (Some slightly offensive language below. I believe is warranted under > the circumstances, and there is nothing worse than has already been > used in this thread. If you suspect you'll be offended, please delete > this message.) > > Kris, > > We're all sorry that we didn't drop everything that we are doing and > rush in to answer your question. Clearly any question that you have > should outweigh our miserable lives and jobs. > > I'll give you a little lesson on etiquette here, though I know you'll > only ignore it. If you want people to actually help you, for free, and > at the expense of other peoples valuable time, you should try to > refrain from being an asshole. Sometimes, if you ask a question no > one will know the answer. Generally speaking, rather than everyone > wasting time responding to your email "I don't know", if people don't > know the answer they just won't respond. Unfortunately that means that > sometimes your question will go unanswered. If that happens, POLITELY > post again, don't just start going around calling people "prick" and > "cocksucker". If after your second post you still don't get an > answer, you can probably safely assume that we don't know the answer. > > This reasonably polite response was far more than you deserved. The > advice above is recommended for use on other mailing lists in the > future. I recommend that you not bother posting on this list again, > since I doubt that you'll find the other list members terribly helpful > towards you in the future. On the other hand, a sincere apology can > sometimes go a long way. It might be worth a try. > > On Feb 13, 2008 1:15 PM, Kris Weston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ...... > > > > cocksucker > > > > (that was the second ever written occurrence of tourettes syndrome) > > > > > > > > On Feb 13, 2008 9:35 PM, gordon anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > nope, nobody reads this list. I guess they got tired of people > expecting > > something for nothing . . . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 13-Feb-08, at 12:16 , Kris Weston wrote: > > > > > > maturity is over-rated > > > > > > and had you actually shown any sign of it yourself you would have read > my > > initial posting with the question you seem to desire so badly - even > though > > its got fuck all to do with you and you probably wouldnt know the answer > > anyway and actually are probably to busy to answer because you are > updating > > your sad blog where you pretend that people have an interest in your > > heartfelt opinions on important subjects like whatever is coming out of > your > > state propaganda box at 6pm and anyway if you knew that blogging is > actually > > what minds would do if they had anuses would you stop policing the > internet > > with your opinions and mails telling people to 'ask questions' > > > why dont you ask yourself a question? "why am i a such a ginga twat > and > > why do i feel that i need to police the internet"? > > > > > > thankyou for listening > > > this has been a cathartic experience. > > > cheers. > > > > > > Kristian Weston > > > > > > > > > On Feb 13, 2008 8:58 PM, Chris Janes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > King of maturity I see... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Had you started with an actual question about instiki, someone may > have > > been able to help – rather than just responding to your initial inane > > offerings. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris Weston > > > > Sent: 13 February 2008 19:50 > > > > To: Instiki-users > > > > Subject: Re: [Instiki] HellooooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOO > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > shutup you prick - i hate these people who think they can police > email > > lists.. > > > > ive posted my question - doesnt seem like anyone is on here who > knows > > anything so ill fix it myself..... > > > > > > > > later bitches > > > > > > > > Kris Weston > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 13, 2008 7:02 PM, Mike Payson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Well,, why don't you ask your question rather then just randomly > > > > posting? Probably be a whole lot better use of everyone's time, > > > > wouldn't it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Instiki-users mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/instiki-users > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Instiki-users mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/instiki-users > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Instiki-users mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/instiki-users > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Instiki-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/instiki-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Instiki-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/instiki-users >
_______________________________________________ Instiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/instiki-users
