On 16 feb 2008, at 0:43, Derick Winkworth wrote: > My thought was essentially using the address field as defined in RFC > 1662. Differing addresses in this field would be used by the > translating router to forward traffic to differing neighboring > routers on the ethernet segment. So there would effectively be a PPP- > address-TO-Ethernet-MAC table.
RFC 1662 defines the address field to be 0xff, so it's not possible to do this and be compatible with RFC 1662. Wouldn't it be easier to just route the packet and do proxy ARP on the ethernet side? _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
