I thought this whole discussion seemed oddly familiar; we
had essentially the same one 5 years ago:

  http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg00446.html
  http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg00475.html
  etc. etc.

Also, I made the comment at the mike that maximum per-nbr MTU
information could be used in conjunction with the SEAL approach.
See the following draft (dated 10/30/02) that essentially
proposed this:

  http://www3.tools.ietf.org/html/draft-templin-v6v4-ndisc-01

Fred
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to