Jari,
I have two comments on this draft.
1.
In section 3.1, it is not absolutely clear that the range
33 - 65502 is meant to be used when assigning IETF consensus
defined values by IANA. The table says the values are for IANA
future use (without specfying what that use is), while the text
that follows the table does not specify a range (or row entry).
I suggest replacing "... IANA for future use" with "...
IANA for future assignment."
2.
In section 3.2, I would suggest inserting a properly dis-
ambiguated table (similar to the one in 3.1) as a visual aid to
understanding the text in this section.
--
Eric Gray
Principal Engineer
Ericsson
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jari Arkko
> Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 9:58 AM
> To: Internet Area
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] draft-manner-router-alert-iana WGLC
>
> I have not seen any reviews yet. Please take the time to look at this
> draft, as several reviews are necessary in order to move the document
> forward.
>
> (And I'll mention that the document is short and easy to read.)
>
> Jari
>
> Jari Arkko kirjoitti:
> > This message marks the start of an Intarea Last Call for
> reviewing the
> > router alert document. Please take a look at this document before
> > Tuesday, May 6th.
> >
> > The document can be found from here:
> >
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-manner-router-alert-iana
> >
> > Jari
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Int-area mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
>
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
