Hi, We are in the middle of fixing the IP Router Alert Option registry and allocations, and one issue affects the current RSVP implementations.
There are two values that indicate end-to-end RSVP: "1" Datagram contains RSVP message [RFC2711] "3" RSVP Aggregation Level 0 [RFC3175] We are currently proposing that value "3" should be removed from use, and reserved (not to be allocated to any protocol). Thus, value "1" should be used to indicate end-to-end RSVP. The question is: who have RSVP implementations for IPv6, and would this change break something? Regards, Jukka _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
